|
|
2. Economic Aggression by World Powers and the
Movement to Protect
|
(1) Unequal Treaties and Movements to Amend Them |
|
All of the treaties that the Choson government concluded with Japan since
1876 were unequal in content. The Treaty of Amity stipulated that three ports
including Pusan should be opened to Japanese merchants to build houses and to
engage freely in commerce. In addition, Japanese criminals were placed under the
jurisdiction of the Japanese Consul. As for trade regulations, no customs duties
were to be imposed on trade with Japan and Japanese merchants could engage in
commercial activities with Japanese currency in the open ports. The unequal
treaties concluded with Japan not only provided a legal springboard for Japan's
political and economic aggressions against Choson but also negatively influenced
future treaties signed with the United States, China, Germany, England and
France. Thus, in a short time, Choson concluded unequal treaties with world
powers which greatly infringed upon the political and economical autonomy of
Choson. |
| |
 |
 |
|
Previous of the Korea-Japan Friendship Treaty :
Signed in 1876, it was the first modern treaty between the two countries and led
the way to the opening of Korean ports. |
The United States officially established diplomatic relations
with Korea on May 22. 1882, when commodore Robert W. Shufeldt negotiated and
signed the Treaty of Peace, Amity, Commerce and Navigation at Chemulp'o
(present-day inch'on) | |
| |
|
The government, realizing that the treaty with Japan was
responsible for many difficulties, made many efforts to amend the article in the
treaty which exempted Japan from paying tariffs. The government, while sending
emissaries like Kim Hong-chip, to negotiate with Japan, also lobbied for
diplomatic assistance from China and the U.S. Through these efforts a new treaty
with Japan was reached in 1883. However, the treaty concluded with Japan at
this time was not equal either. Although Japan was obliged to pay tariffs, they
were marginal and the rights of the Japanese consular to execute legal
judgements and to reside in the open ports remained unchanged. |
| |
|
(2) Plundering Trade and Grain Embargo |
|
The other world powers also forced Choson to conclude unequal treaties which
therefore caused an unfair trade arrangement. Among them, merchants from Japan
and China were the cruelest. For example, Chinese merchants bought British
cotton goods at low prices in Shanghai and sold them at high prices to make
tremendous profits, and also carried out smuggling activities under the
protection of Yuan Shi-kai. The Japanese merchants at first, acted as
intermediaries in trade by buying and selling British goods but, with the
gradual development of the domestic industry, Japan exported and sold Japanese
goods. They mainly sold cotton goods, matches, liquor and chiefly bought rice,
gold, cowhide and beans. The Chinese and Japanese merchants competed in
trading with Choson. But 50% of the amount of Choson imports and 90% of the
amount of exports went to Japan. Rice from Choson, in particular, was an
indispensable trade item to Japan where industry was developing and cheap rice
was demanded in large quantities. As a result of the plundering trade
activities of the Japanese merchants in importing rice, the poor farmers and the
laborers of Choson suffered the most. They had commonly experienced shortages of
food but when rice began to be exported to Japan, the farmers and workers were
even more hard-pressed. To make matters worse, they had to buy and use expensive
industrial goods imported from Japan. Thus, in many areas, farmers and laborers
frequently demanded that Japanese merchants be prohibited from trading and the
export of rice to Japan. The government foresaw this situation and wanted to
insert a grain embargo clause in their treaty with Japan, but due to Japanese
opposition, such efforts failed. They were, however, able to obtain a provision
which stated that in cases of famine or other such situations, with one month
prior notification to Japan, grain export might be temporarily
suspended. With the above provision, local governors operated the measure to
block exports of rice and soybeans. Among them, the embargo of the Hamgyong and
Hwanghae provinces were the most famous. When the exports of rice and
soyabeans were suspended as a result of such embargos, Japanese merchants made
collective protests and appealed to their home government to add diplomatic
pressure. The Japanese government threatened that unless the Choson government
abolished the embargo and paid for damages to the Japanese merchants it would
attack Choson by mobilizing its warships. The Choson government, under
Japanese pressure, was forced to lift the embargos and make indemnities to
Japanese merchants. However, the unjustifiable pressure and plundering of grain
by Japan planted deeper and stronger anti-Japanese feelings in the hearts of the
Choson farmers and laborers. The peasant army which rose up with cries to expel
foreign powers reflected this sentiment. |
|
|
|
(3) Infiltration of Foreign Merchants and the Movement to Safeguard
Commercial Rights |
|
The trade activities of the Chinese and Japanese merchants naturally
infringed upon Korean merchants' activities which had grown in the latter period
of Choson. Therefore, in the open ports and in important cities throughout the
country, merchants of Choson, China, and Japan repeatedly engaged in fierce
competitive battles around commercial activities rights. The Chinese
merchants, on the basis of their superior capital, engaged in many activities in
Inch'on and Seoul. They received the protection of Yuan Shi-kai and occupied the
central streets of Seoul and carried out trade by sailing between Shanghai and
Inch'on. The Japanese merchants developed their activities in the open ports
of Pusan and Wonsan, then gradually infiltrated into the interior and advanced
to central Seoul. They received financial support from the Bank of Japan which
was set up in Seoul and Pusan and took control of trade by traveling between
Osaka and each of the open ports. The Choson merchants engaged in domestic
and foreign trade while confronting the Chinese and Japanese merchants, but they
were soon driven out of the important commercial activities. Thus, they founded
companies or Kaekchu corporations to collectively challenge the Chinese and
Japanese merchants and sometimes even closed up shops to protest against illegal
persons residing in Choson or unlawful commercial activities by the Chinese and
Japanese merchants. But the Choson merchants could not defeat the Chinese and
Japanese merchants who infiltrated Choson through a strong screen known as
extraterritoriality. Moreover, under foreign intervention, the government of
Choson was unable to adequately protect its merchants, and Choson merchants
could not help but reduce the sphere of their activities. The cries of the
peasants army and the Hwalbin-dang to expel the foreign merchants out of Choson
was a reflection of the resentment of Choson merchants who went bankrupt due to
the infiltration of the foreigners, in particular, the Japanese merchants.
|
| |
|
(4) The Succession of the Rights to Choson's National Resources by the World
Powers and the Movement to Recover Them |
|
The world powers took away various economic rights from Choson. In
particular, when King Kojong was taking refuge in the Russian Legation and was
unable to exercise the sovereign right to govern, the rights to Choson's
railroads, mines, and forests went into the hands of Russia, the United States,
Japan, France, England, and Germany. Russia possessed the rights to the mines
in Kyongwon and Chongsong plus the lumbering rights in the basins of the Yalu
and Ulung Island. The United States held the rights to construction of the
Seoul-Inch'on railroad, the mining rights to the Unsan gold mine plus the rights
to install electricity and water works in Seoul. Japan obtained construction
rights to the Seoul-Pusan railroad, gold mining and coastal fishing rights.
France obtained rights to construct the Seoul-Sinuiju railroad. England held the
mining rights to the Unsan gold mines and Germany had the mining rights to the
Tanghyon gold mine. When the rights to a country's natural resources, which
are the basis for building a powerful nation, were transferred into the hands of
other nations, the people began to denounce the government as corrupt and
incapable. The people demanded the recovery of these rights which had been taken
away. The Independence Council urged, through its publication of the Independent
Newspaper, that the government rid itself of a policy of foreign dependency
policy and adopt a diplomatic policy of self-reliance. They also advocated the
recovery of these various rights, which had been taken away by foreign powers,
and urged the development of natural resources in order to enhance the nation's
own strength. The Hwalbin-dang and the local people also urged the government
to protect national resources. They pointed out that railroads are like the
artery of the state and construction rights to them should not be given to
foreigners and, therefore, the Seoul-Pusan and the Seoul-Sinuiju railways should
be recovered. The cries for the recovery of national resources from the
people in the cities and rural communities gave impetus to the government to
recover the construction rights to the Seoul-Pusan and Seoul-Sinuiju railroads.
Hence, encouraging private capitalists to participate in railroad construction
and mine development. However, due to the ever increasing infiltration of
Japanese forces, which grew after the expulsion of the other invading powers,
the efforts for the development of self-reliance by Choson failed. |
|
|