Examples of Distortions
Rumania:
¡°Economic development in Korea is partially based on the industrial
infrastructure created during the Japanese colonial period and ¡¦¡±(Modern
Industries, Mircheastomian, 1992.)
China:
¡°Joseon modern education system developed rapidly under Japanese rule. The
Japanese Governor¡¯s Office sought to modernize education in Joseon by
introducing the Japanese education system. Joseon¡¯s educational accomplishments
during that time greatly contributed to the subsequent modernization and
development of the country¡±(Yin, Bao-yun, Why did Korea succeed, Wen-jin
Publishers, 1993.)
Comment
There are those who believer
that Japan¡¯s colonial rule greatly contributed to Korea¡¯s development into a
modern nation. This view accepts Japan¡¯s justification of its colonization of
Korea.
In other words, according to some
Japanese scholars, Korea¡¯s backward economic structure was replaced and the
groundwork for a modern capitalist economy laid during the Japanese occupation
of Korea. For examples, there are those who maintain that Korea achieved
significant industrialization during the Japanese occupation because of a land
survey, plans to increase rice production and the construction of plants for
making war materials. All of the above were initiated by the Japanese, but it
was don¡¯t to exploit the resources of Korea.
Moreover, the incipient development
of capitalism in Korea during the Japanese occupation was not intended to
benefit the Korean people. Rather, it was intended to exploit Korean resources
for Japanese economic development. That is, Korea was forced by Japan into an
abnormal form of modernization which only benefited Japan. Korea¡¯s independent
attempts at modernization which were made prior to Japan¡¯s colonization, never
had a chance to materialize due to Japan¡¯s annexation of the
country.
Korea¡¯s fast economic growth in
recent decades was driven by abundant and high-quality labor, a high regard for
education, and a strong sense of industriousness. The legacy of the Japanese
occupation left nothing but negative practices in Korea, including a Jaebeol
(conglomerate) oriented economy and collusion between politicians and
businessman. Therefore, the argument that Japan¡¯s actions benefited Korea fails
to appreciate the enormous hardship suffered by Koreans under Japanese colonial
rule. Furthermore, such a claim ranks with statements made by some Japanese
politicians who attempt to justify Japan¡¯s military expansion in Asia prior to
and during World War II as the liberation of Asian countries from Western
colonial rule. |